The recent revocation of a USDA grant intended for the study of feminine hygiene products has sparked controversy. Originally awarded to Southern University in Baton Rouge, the $600,000 grant aimed to develop natural fiber-based feminine hygiene products. However, the grant was abruptly canceled by the Department of Agriculture, led by newly appointed Secretary Brooke Rollins.

The decision to revoke the grant was based on misleading information propagated by social media posts and certain organizations. Contrary to claims suggesting the study focused on “menstrual cycles in transgender men,” the university clarified that the research was centered on creating safer products for all biological women. The project, titled “Project Farm to Feminine Hygiene,” aimed to explore the use of natural fibers like regenerative cotton, wool, and hemp in the production of sustainable feminine hygiene products such as pads, liners, and underwear.

The controversy surrounding the grant revocation stems from a misinterpretation of a single reference to transgender men in the project proposal summary. While acknowledging that transgender men, as well as individuals with masculine gender identities, intersex, and non-binary persons, may menstruate, the study’s primary objective was to enhance the quality and safety of feminine hygiene products for women and girls.

The USDA’s decision to cancel the grant was influenced by the misrepresentation of the study’s focus, which prompted concerns about the alignment of the project with the policies of the Trump Administration. President Trump’s executive orders emphasizing the recognition of two sexes, male and female, further fueled the controversy surrounding the grant revocation.

In response to the misconceptions surrounding the study, Southern University clarified that the project was not intended to investigate menstrual cycles in transgender men but rather to advance the development of natural fiber-based feminine hygiene products. The university emphasized that the reference to transgender men in the proposal was aimed at highlighting the inclusive nature of the research, which aimed to benefit all biological women by providing them with safer and healthier feminine hygiene options.

The incident underscores the importance of accurate representation and interpretation of research initiatives, especially in sensitive areas such as gender and healthcare. Moving forward, it is crucial for stakeholders to ensure that information is communicated transparently and accurately to prevent misunderstandings and misinformation that could impact vital research projects like the study on feminine hygiene products.